[ 內容 | 搜尋 | 張貼 | 回覆 | 下一個 | 上一個 | 上一頁 ]

Re: 「公屋寵物唔人道」—錯誤的邏輯

寄件者: Padma Tserin
寄件者電郵:
Date: 21 Sep 2003
Time: 02:38:27
Remote Name: 218.102.21.145

文章內容

訪客呀訪客，不知你會否返回這裡。但你的邏輯有些問題。

閣下所提出的論點其實已有很多人論述過了。所謂「租例已有講明不准養動物」，你覺得是有力的理據，是不是？有空看看這裡罷：

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=7&i=279808&t=279808

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=7&i=279835&t=279808

﹦﹦﹦﹦﹦

至於「住公屋就不應養動物，養動物就不要住公屋」，這邏輯就更奇怪了。有空看看這裡的討論吧。我讀過不少很有見地的討論，但由於有太多留言了，這裡祇是其中一小部份：

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=7&i=279106&t=279106

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=2&i=286590&t=286590

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=2&i=286914&t=286590

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=8&i=278415&t=277848

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=8&i=278508&t=277848

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=2&i=285893&t=285893

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=2&i=285900&t=285893

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=9&i=278159&t=278159

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=9&i=278252&t=278252

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/index.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=9¤t_page=10

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=3&i=286265&t=286265

http://www.hkedcity.net/english/meeting-point/forum/read.phtml?forum_id=61¤t_page=3&i=286274&t=286265

我不是公屋住戶，但在是次事見中也覺得房署實在不顧後果一點、及一些不喜歡動物的人士心胸也未免太狹隘。你是不喜歡動物的人罷？對其他生命無特別愛心？但無論如何多一些包容吧，你會快樂一點。